 | Walk Down the Apocalyptic Path | Feb 19, 2007 |
I told her that it wasn't about looks. I told her that meantime girls don't end up as such just because they don't look good enough.
And then she told me....
"But you have to admit, most of the girls who end up as a girlfriend material are the pretty ones."
______________
I couldn't say for certain if the statement was meant to ask me something, or if it was meant to stir up the interaction.
When interacting with this woman, I have to take note that she's in a long term relationship way longer than mine. I no longer remember when the "meantime" relationships took place within the time span of her legitimate relationship. I no longer remember the details of what she was telling me. Though she did say that the main relationship was an open relationship so I guess, there were instances of relationship overlaps. Being in a relationship longer than mine means that chances are, whatever I say about relationships, she already knows. Otherwise, if she isn't knowledgeable, I wouldn't be interacting with her on a regular basis, let along blog something about her. That's one of the major differences that she has with her younger, less mature, meantime girl ilk. The others....just don't have a clue, let alone listen to reason.
"But you have to admit, most of the girls who end up as a girlfriend material are the pretty ones." This statement appears to be partially smart, partially naive, and partially mirrors her possible insecurity. I couldn't say which one is which, and at that time she told me this statement, I'm not in a mood for an intellectual discourse.
But since we've never talked about that conversation since then, I would just say that maybe the statement is a summation of those three elements--meaning: her witty observation, her naive side that asks for insights, and a reflection of her subconscious in which her insecurity about being second to some other female archetype shows up.
The statement is smart because she observed a correlation. It's a bit naive, in my opinion beause it's not a causation. And it mirrors her insecurity because she always would mention to me about her being the wallflower back then. At least the statement mirrors that.
________________
If I'm going to be sarcastic about it, the basis for being a girlfriend material couldn't possibly be based on looks because there are fewer pretty girls out there and the that category couln't possibly be monopolized by a marginalized sector. It's just not right to think of it that way.
And...in any case, by the time we young guys get into the age of 30s or 40s, we would be no longer that much interested in looks. Looks have always been overrated anyway. Some people have the luxury to talk about that because they're young. It doesn't mean though that it's the only thing that can be talked about forever. Everyone loses it one way or another.
When we talk about a meantime girl, we already have a cue--the word meantime. That means temporal, shortlived. Of course, the opposite of the word would be something like, long-term, or permanent. In other words, the opposite of a meantime girl would be a girl that can be in a relationship that is longer or, better sustained. Does looks have to with the difference? I don't think so. Really....I think the issue has always been character based. And yes, I know it's a generic Miss Universe of an answer, but it has always been what's within that counts.
To be continued.... You Are the Music In Me.mp4 (13.4 MB)
Can't Take My Eyes Off You.mp4 (27.8 MB)
If I'm not mistaken, Batman is among the spearheads of contemporary Noir revival in the comic book industry, initiated specifically by arguably the most infamous batman book ever, Dark Knight Returns.
One can argue then, that it would be a bit of a redundancy if we put the words Noir and Batman in one sentence and say that that a series about this superhero is expected to have depth, and a darker tone. After all, the series already embodies the aforementioned characteristics.
Therefore, just being dark per se won't be able to cut it when we refer to doing something out of the Batman franchise. It's already obvious that the series would be dark and it would be a matter of careful thinking as to how to keep the franchise interesting.
When Batman Begins was about to be shown, there were questions raised as to how the film would keep its Noir identity by making it apparent that the setting this time would be more grounded, with Gotham City having a more streamlined modern look, losing its expected gothic architectural landscape; and also, the batmobile, having a more rugged Humvee look. It just promises too much to lose an artistic flair that made the series revitalized to begin with.
Of course, we all know that the formula being used was giving Bruce Wayne a level of introductory depth in Batman Begins that made him so appealing, you start to forget that everything else looked so contemporary. Even the main villan Ra's Al Ghul looked remarkably believable that it made a lot of people think that a more grounded Batman movie incarnation has a legitimate appeal.
Everybody knows that all the introductions and the new motif have been done in the first movie. And it's safe to say that the makers of the film would capitalize on those established new formulas that worked. However, it raises a question as to how the film will be given a push this time around. What would be the approach then that should be used?
________________________
The answer is....work on the different dualities of the human psyche outside the usual moral connotations of the black and white duality.
And of course, the result was arguably among the thought provoking incarnations of Batman Ive seen yet, solidified under the framework of two characters that probably couldn't portray the human psyche any better--Joker and Two Face.
You have Batman, expectedly, as an anti-hero (a gray value), constrained by his own idea of moral righteousness, which essentially makes him a hero, though this part of him may not necessarily be useful in some situations where a spontaneous make-or-break decision is needed.
On top of the layer of morality that is personified by the Dark Knight are different layers of dualities that have been portrayed by the villains. The Joker provided an anti-thesis to the perceived righteousness of setting a goal, strategy, and sound judgment--where a mere change in the status quo in a person's quest for eventual gratification (the connotation of money as being the universal goal was clearly illustrated) can be disastrous.
The point of his contention was clearly illustrated in the two events he orchestrated himself, namely the dilemma of the two ships and his manipulation of Harvey Dent after his trauma. In the two situations, respectively, the inner complex structure of the implications of human judgment were clearly illutrated--both the dilemma of making a judgment and the negativity of its aftermath, assuming it was done. In the case of the two ships, for example, a sacrifice is at an equal footing with the benefits, as one's survival has an equivalent of someone else's death, implying that even if one becomes so decisive, it doesn't come at a price, and another thing that adds more complexity to this is that everyone has his or her own decision, and even if people appear to be on the same side of righteousness, it may not necessarily mean that they're all looking at the same direction--this was clearly illustrated with the eventual death of Rachel Dawes, as it added fracture to what seems to be a coherent alliance between Dent, Wayne and Gordon.
In my opinion, there's no better illustration of a negative aftermath of a failed vision than Harvey Dent's case. I actually liked the connotation implied by the coin, where every flip ends up with the same side, making Harvey act under the context of his free will every time, until things get fucked up in the end, and optimistic decisiveness suddenly turns into fatalism--a matter of chance, symbolized now by the duality of the state of Harvey Dent's face.
And after all the implications have been looked at; after the multi faceted side of the truth has been unwrapped, one has to wonder if the truth is all that or would it be better to keep a white lie just to have something going. This was the eventual fate of the Batman, and up to this point I'm still thinking about the brilliance of the dangling ending that the movie showed up--a contrast between a truth that will keep us pessimistic, and a lie that somehow keeps people going. And suddenly, one may now be inclined to think if there was really a best choice to begin with.

|  | Currently anticipating the DK hype. Too bad I wasn't able to get out the bigger Tumbler toy that's way inside my cabinet. Hence no picture of it. |
At one point, she told me...
"For some guys, we're just either a piece of meat, or an imposing brain."
For one, she should be thankful that she manages to have a second characteristic--an imposing brain. Normally, most of her meantime girl ilk don't progress beyond the first category. Ouch! Anyway, she should be thankful she has a brain. Lots of it.
Before writing this down, I asked her if I can blog something about this statement that she told me a few months ago. She said, she can no longer remember saying it. At that time, I was not in the mood in retelling her the situation that brought her into saying that statement. Still, I'll blog about it just the same. I'm not sure if she'll be able to read this blog soon enough, but that's quite beyond the point.
I like the way she delivered that line--simple, straightforward, and considerably honest. It saves me the misery of being in a politically correct mode just so that I won't be offensive to anyone. I need not be politically correct anymore because she's already honest to herself. She acknowledges the truth most of the other meantime girls aren't so easily willing to accept.
She's a young woman in her 30s. Married and well established, she's a definitive Alpha Female in the very definition of the phrase. And just like any other established individual, she works in the shadows--decisively elusive. As a married woman, she has to make sure that everything is well wrapped and already taken care of. After all, she now traverses a different stage of life, far from the night outs and other forms of adventures that are expected of her to get involved with.
Back, then, I would ask her to come with me, meet some of my friends and things like that. I'm sure, they'd like to meet her. And then, she'd give me the usual apology. She can't come. That part, I understand. She doesn't need to expound things further. But at least I've done what I can to give her the usual invites. After all, I owe quite a lot to this person.
"For some guys, we're just either a piece of meat, or an imposing brain." Thinking of this statement over and over again makes me appreciate how much of an intellectual genius this woman is. But honestly though, she shouldn't have used the word "we". It can create the impression that there are a lot of them who have an imposing brain. If anything, the statement can be misleading. She sure has an imposing brain, but that doesn't apply for every meantime girl there is.
One thing I've learned about relationships is that, I have to check out the maturity of the person I'm talking with--make sure that my outlook with the person is somehow in sync, otherwise I might be hitting myself onto a brick wall. In cases where I'm talking with a stereotypical meantime girl, maturity is something that can be quite elusive to them, and I would have to make sure that I have my tolerance ready otherwise the inevitable friction would manifest itself. They can be bratty. Beautiful, charming, brats.
But I have to consider this woman an exemption . At her age of 30 something, she's expected to be more mature than me. Not just more mature, but practically better in every aspect--stature, etc. And she is. That's one of the few reasons why I consider her among my really few relationship confidants. She's among the few whom I consider to be at a higher playing field than me.
Don't get me wrong though. I don't consider her perfect. As evolved as she is, she has her own share of insecurities, some of which she tells me. And being the analytical guy that I am, I take into account most of what she says.
There's the ever insecurity of not being pretty enough. She has that thing going in her psyche. Not that I want to confirm or deny it but...well, for one, she doesn't strike me as someone that I'll be infatuated with. For one, I look at her like an elder sister figure, because age-wise, she literally falls under that category.
I asked her to show me a college picture of her. It could at least change my perspective. After seeing it, I realized that she's actually cute. Actually, cuter than most girls that I know. So I can say for real that her insecurity is a bit uncalled for. I would want to tell her for the most part that it's wrong to think that she's getting treated like a meantime girl because she's not pretty enough. That's like a false mentality that she can't get off her system. I would like to say that, as fallacious at it may sound--to guys, looks is not everything. Really. It never were.
End of Part 1 I was a bit surprised with what I discovered in the news with regard to the Iphone 3G hype. Every dork in town are lining up in the streets to have the opportunity to be among the first people to have the unit, even if meant they have to take their evening sleep there.
The situation reminds me of most dork oriented events, e.g., launch of Halo 2 on the X-Box, early screening of a Star Wars movie, etc. The Iphone 3G hype, with a $199 price tag, and a set of 3G features, shows quite a lot of interesting revelations:
- USA is a couple of years behind any other country when it comes to mobile phone technology.
- Dorks now have a chance to be cool.
- And still, some people with more money and less brain would also have a chance to be cool.
Yeah, that's right. USA is still lagging when it comes to mobile phone technology. 3G? I'm already been using it since my Nokia N70 days, though not that much. What Apple won't tell everyone is that, 3G, for the most part, has not proven itself to be a commercial success. At least in the Philippines, it isn't. I 'm a bit amazed as to why something as old as 3G would be marketed as something new somewhere else, when it's still need to thrive in the areas that spearheaded its creation.
One of the wrong approaches that I've seen being done with the marketing of 3G is the promise that it's a social tool--an entity that supposedly makes everyone even more connected. So that probably explains why Nokia and other mobile phone companies, over the part couple of years, have been associating their mobile phones to some websites that are intended for social networking. For example, in my N82, there are notable references to Flickr (in which there's supposedly an "easy" option via the N82 unit to upload photos to that site, taken by the N82 itself), and then there are other "social" programs like, instant messaging, etc.
What these companies overlooked, for one, is that online connectivity in mobile phones is by no way an easy thing to understand. Understanding 3G is an endeavor more suited for a mobile phone geek than a casual user. And intellectual geekiness or anything that requires it has always been an anti-social function. For an effective social dynamics to prosper, lightness and simplicity should always be taken into consideration. And yup, even it requires dorks to particpate themselves in a very condescending TV network wars by the mainstream fans so that they won't feel out of place. Yes, they have to forcefully calibrate their IQ a few notches down.
I am an average mobile phone load user. I spend an estimated 1000 pesos a month ($25) of prepaid load for my N82. That's basically 100 pesos, activated to 5 days of unlimited text messaging using Globe Telecom's text unlimited promo. You multiply 6 to 5 days and that would account 600 pesos a month for the sheer unlimited text messaging consumption, plus a couple of hundreds more to take into account other uses like phone call, yielding a rough estimate of 1000 pesos.
For a Nokia unit than runs on a Symbian OS, theoretically, 3G activation is easy. The program called Settings Wizard in the Menu screen would make things a step easier. If I'm not mistaken, after the Access Points have been downloaded courtesy of the Settings Wizard, the user just needs to inform Globe that the N82's use of 3G can now be set.
Of course, that's just the main procedure. Other things also have to be taken into account like making sure that the Network is running on dual mode 3G (HSDPA) / GPRS (Edge), instead of sheer GPRS, and whatnot.
Based on personal observation, a huge chunk of users of a 3G phone can no longer picture out these procedures, hence they already lose interest on the 3G benefits even if they haven't even used them yet.
And even if they've already activated the needed initial procedures, they also have to live with the fact that the data usage will be charged on a per kilobyte basis, making 3G usage even more discouraging. So far, Globe Telecom has a promo of a 5 peso usage consumption for every 15 minutes, but so far I'm not even sure myself if I have already activated the feature using my N82.
Now, let's say that for some weird reason, I had excess money and I decided to have fun with 3G for the heck of it, the next problem that I would have to face is....
Which access point gives access to which feature?
AGPS - (Asia Maps / Garmin XT) - ?? Visual Radio - ?? Instant Messaging - ?? Ngage Arena ??
Not to mention the old school functions like...
MMS - Globe MMS Email - ?? Video Streaming - ?? Wap Browsing - Goble Internet Web browsing - Globe Internet
Can somebody please tell me which access point gives access to what?
On second thought, there's a freakin' WIFI anyway...so I'll just look for a WIFI hotspot instead. It will save me the misery.
But assuming that I've done the near impossibility of having these tedious procedures figured out and eventually, things are now considerably easy...will I now use the web functions on a regular basis?
Web browsing -- not really. It can wait at home. Actually, all the interenet stuff that I do can wait at home, all at the comfort of a desktop PC that runs on a basic broadband connection. Not to mention that a real keyboard is much more comfortable
Instant Messaging - not really. Typing with the celphone's numeric pad hurts my thumb
Visual Radio - I don't even know what that is.
AGPS - assuming that I get lost, I may use this.
MMS - I'll only use this once I get to have a significant number of friends who ACTUALLY know how to use this feature.
Email - same reason with Instant Messaging. It hurts the thumb. By the way, this puts into account that the situation where Globe charges a cheap rate on this. But the fact is, their HSDPA rate is ridiculously overpriced--something like 2000 pesos, and I'm not even sure if that's unlimited. Fuck, my Bayan Tel landline plus DSL bundle is barely 1400 pesos and it's good. No one has the right to charge me 2000 for something where internet usage is even more impractical and inconvenient.
Iphone has tried to make its internet surfing experience more promising by virtue of its bigger screen and stylus interface. While it provides a theoretically more promising web surfing interface, it doesn't necessarily produce the convenience that a regular phone keypad provides for some of the more basic things like a phone call or text messaging. In my opinion, a phone needs to be a phone first before it tries to beciome something else entirely. I saw this music video a while ago. It shows clips from the upcoming movie. The couple being portrayed here shows similarity with the better-known Kim Chiu and Gerald Anderson of My Girl, where the girl acts a perky, naive, main character and the male acts as an uptight, well established business executive. The formula is cliche-ic, the plot is expectedly light, but the twist is...the chemistry is surprisingly good, based from what I saw on the trailer. Cheesy, but good, definitely even more so than the less refined Kim-Gerald duo. I have little faith in the director though, since I wasn't really that impressed with One More Chance, but at least the trailer is worth looking. Import.flv (9.6 MB)
One of the initial problems I have to deal with when I first joined peyups.com was the amount of insecure confrontational egotistic dorks that I have to get myself used to. They're practically everywhere.
To those of you who'd be reading this that have little idea of what UP life is like, it's basically like this--remember those attention-whore, leader-wannabe dorks that everybody hates in high school? Well, most of them ended up in UP. And guess what, more attention-whorish dorks mean more competition which also means that a typical UPIAN would be expected to jack-up even more his attention-whoring proficiency just to remain competitive.
Unless, of course, the UPIAN would be in a college where attention whoring is not that much important and you can practically survive with zero traces of personality and social life, like the College of Engineering, for example. Actually, that's the college where uncool people and faculty members are expected to be found. Coolness there is a rarity, unless you get to find people on a regular basis that's comparable to Nickah_Gurl. But the opportunity isn't always there.
First problem I have to deal with is...some people are too lazy to read. I've been getting tons of complaints, ranging from what I write and how I write my forum posts. I can't believe that people would easily be offended at how a person writes things, when he's not even ridiculing or being sarcastic to anyone.
______________________
Cypocalypse2: Cypocalypse, you write way too long.
Cypocalypse1: There's always an ignore option. One can always use it.
Cypocalypse2: But it makes their eyes hurt.
Cypocalypse1: Again, there's always an ignore option.
Cypocalypse2: Or you can use Tagalog.
Cypocalypse1: Writing in Tagalog is complex. It seems easy to do because we use it as a spoken language all the time, but writing is a different field, really.
_____________________
Really, it's a good venue for personality analysis. In an ego saturated community like peyups.com (or UP in a broader sense), you can easily look at a person's weakness by looking at the thing that he hates.
Cypocalypse2: For example, a guy who has issues with machismo sometimes manifest in showing hatred for gays.
Cypocalypse1: Yeah, with that alone, you can already name two prominent peyups.com members with regard to that.
Cypocalypse2: Or, a Peyups.com member with no legitimate literary proficiency will most likely hate the writers.
Cypocalypse1: Exactly. And you can also look at the opposite side of this. A peyups.com member who have a bit of an inclination with literature will probably look at the works of the columnists--like Lagsh for example.
Cypocalypse2: But what if, the Peyups people involved in a conflict are girls having a catfight, what would be their weakness?
Cypocalypse1: Boys! 
Cypocalypse2: Oh! But anyway...why look at the weaknesses?
Cypocalypse1: You look at them so that when you get assaulted at Peyups.com again, you have a legit set of weapons with you. You'll never know when someone is going to strike.
____________________
One of Cypocalypse's first problems that he has to cope with when he first posted in peyups.com was the notion of popularity contest. Some people think that my posting style is a pretension. But for some people who are used to posting on other foreign message boards (PEX doesn't count because the posting style of most members there aren't really that better than the average posting style of any peyups.com member).
Cypocalypse2: Aminin mo na kasi. Bago ka nag Peyups, nagpo post ka sa ibang message boards, like shoryuken.com, na ang mga members eh karamihan nogngog na ungas, tapos kung meron ka mang nakaka interact na mga Pilipino, karamihan dun eh Ingleserong taga La Salle na naglalaro sa University Mall. So kailangan English ang post mo at kailangan matino ka mag post kasi magiging kapareho mo yung mga nognog dun sa shoryuken.com, na ang grammar at spelling eh mas malala pa sa Pinoy.
Cypocalypse1: Aba! Tagalog na yan ah!
Cypocalypse2: Ganito kasi problema mo. Gusto mo English kasi mas poetic sya. True, hirap maging poetic sa tagalog kasi magtutunog archaic, pero kung sa panlalait mo gagamitin ang Tagalog, mas effective sya, kasi mas malutong manlait sa Tagalog.
Cypocalypse1: Really?
Cypocalypse2: Try mo.
_________________
Cypocalypse1: Unang lait na natanggap ko, tinaga ako sa grammar check.
Cypocalypse2: A real linguist doesn't give that much premium on grammar because language is a very complex entity that encompasses a lot of things, and sometimes, being too anal on grammar can prevent a person from stating what he would want to express. Grammar, in this situation becomes more of a hindrance than an actual guide.
Cypocalypse1: Teka, sabi mo, magtatagalog na tayo?
Cypocalypse2: Ano ba sa tagalog ang encompass?
Cypocalypse1: Saklaw?
Cypocalypse2: Ang isang totoong linguist ay di masyadong nagbibigay ng kaukulang importansya sa....ay puki ng ina, English na lang tayo konti. Teka, sino na nga ba ulit yung lalaitin natin? Putek, ang haba na nito, wala ka pang nilalait.
Cypocalypse1: Errrrrrrr........ 
Cypocalypse2: Sabi nga ni Queen, hindi mo pwedeng tapusin ang blog na to sa tono ng save-the-world. Start with a lait, end with a lait. Dali, umpisahan mo na.
Cypocalypse1: Errrrrrrr....... 
Cypocalypse2: Ay, pucha, ako na nga mag-uumpisa. Umpisahan natin dun sa ungas na galit sa bading, na pinaghinalaan ka pang bading, na galit sa mga konyo, na pati English mo inatake, na naasar sa yo kasi you mentioned one time na modelo sa rampa ang isa mong kaibigan, na nanghahabol pa sa ibang thread para lang makapang away ng forum members, na di naman kayang magpakita ng mukha man lang.
Cypocalypse1: Di kayang magpakita ng mukha?
Cypocalypse2: Uhmmm....meron pa nga palang isang ungas dun na di nagpapakita ng mukha. Pero mamaya na yun.
Cypocalypse1: Haha!
Cypocalypse2: Eto ha, simple lait.....
Di ko na problema kung di ka marunong magsulat, di marunong makahanap ng cool chick, o tsinupa ng bakla against your wishes, or wala ka talagang trace ng social awareness (which means that if you're even a bigger ass than Cypocalypse then you're already too much of an ass because, Cypocalypse isn't really even trying to be one), pero ganito lang yan.
Kung feeling mo, superior ka sa bading, well, some gays are cool people to hang out with. SOME. Minsan, they overlap with the bisexual population. Yung mga bisexual, sila yung mga gwapings na mahilig sa kapwa gwapings na ang tambayan madalas eh sa Jupiter Street. How do I know? Madalas sila ang naha hire bilang mga male ramp models. And when they are hired, they get to know FEMALE ramp models. You do the math. Ganyan network ng mga yan. Sa UP, they can normally be found sa Speech Com, Theater, Mass Com, Tourism, Econ din yata. Sa Eng'g halos wala, except nga kay Nickah_Gurl.
Ang kailangan mong gawin eh lumabas minsan sa bahay mo, at tigilan mo na ang pangangalikot sa electronic gadget mo, at dapat babae ang kinakalikot mo. Yun lang. Better if you're in a relationship kasi mas consitent yung kalikot, but sometimes kasi, may ibang mga Peyups.com members na over-infatuated sa pagkakaroon ng achievement (refer to my attention-whore statement a couple pf paragraphs above for reference), na tumanda na't lahat lahat, yumaman na't lahat lahat, bigla yatang nakalimot kung paano kumalikot ng babae at one thing you'll know, magpo post na lang minsan sa Relationship Forum na feeling nila, sila na ang master of kalikot.
Fact is, sa mga ungas na ganyan, please lang.....
Pag nahiritan ka na ni Alexis ng mga tipong..."Those who offer money for love end up with a woman whose love can be bought"...
Ibig sabihin, tablado ka na, checkmate, 3 hit combo, FATALITY! Actually, Cypocalypse's history with the Queen is quite complex--arguably among the most complex forms of acquaintance that I have with anyone.
We first met a few years back--back when Discostu was still the quintessential bullshit in the Peyups.com Relationship Forum. Of course, he has long been banned, leaving the Cypocalypse and another ass to slug it out in the coveted bullshit throne in the Relationship Forum, which, quite ironically, I no longer post at these days when I realize that the regulars there are still relationship kids one way or another. Sort of been there, done that for me, I guess.
I first met the Queen in her college. We also met with two peyups.com peeps. One is a girl and the other one is a guy named Email Failure Notification. For me, it was one of the earliest meetings that I did with any peyups.com member.
Peyups.com night outs would only manifest much later (though there have been night outs before, involving other older members). It started when the Singles Thread was still active, and Bread_&_Sweetpotato was still single. He's normally the person organizing the night outs. He eventually fell in love with his girlfriend, and the dynamics of future meetings would have to change because he can no longer make himself available that much. For one, he no longer qualifies as single.
One thing I have observed with the Queen is her legit Queen-like behavior. People have to talk to the Queen, otherwise, she'll just neglect you. She is not Miss Diplomacy or Congeniality. I've told this to her a couple of times and she was just laughing at the statement. She probably doesn't care, really. Though the smile can be deceiving though. Queen would probably chuckle 90% of the time in the public, and one can be mislead to think that she's actually miss nice. She isn't. She's far from nice.
Further interaction with the queen shows interesting revelations. Nothing surprising, but would definitely connect a lot of dots. Her family set-up isn't necessarily the most ideal one that a queen can wish for, nor her experiences in relationship has not been built by legitimate fidelity. She has to be a queen because the situation calls for it. she didn't have to tell me that statement directly. One just have to connect the dots.
One of Cypocalypse's biggest lessons in his entire stay in Peyups.com would manifest later. The lesson was.....never ever use the notion of ethics while interacting with the Queen. Hell will break loose. Really.
_____________________
Cypocalypse2: Yeah, when that happens Cypocalypse will go down from the heavens to battle the army of the Imperial Peyups Matriarch!
Cypocalypse1: Uhmmm....yeah! 
Cypocalypse2: Which will then make you learn about the next important lesson--never ever mess up with queenie bitches.
Cypocalypse1: Errrrrrrr......
Cypocalypse2: Because some bitches can be charming. 
Cypocalypse1: Ok. 
Cypoclaypse2: See, if you look at your bitch relationship/acquaintance/friendship resume, you're making them hate you at one point. Usually, that happens when you jack up your rationality and you start to get pissed off when the girls become erratic, bitchy, or whatnot. Remember, chicks give no shit about any form of rationality. 
Cypocalypse1: 
Cypocalypse2: But the thing that was not written in the books, what a lot of people don't know--the one thing that can surprise them--you've talked to the Queen after your major slugfest with her. People only know the slugfest. What they probably don't know is that the two of you actually talked, and for the most part, the slugfest was technically over quite immediately.
______________________
For a while it would have been a better idea to let the people know that we had a fight--just that alone. Let them think that she just crossed paths with my more opinionated side. Certainly, the thought of making people know that we talked afterwards would be an unbelievable idea. And besides, at that point in time, I still don't like her that much. Her standpoint should be defined and mine should be the same, hence the idea of letting things end with an impression to everyone that there's no actual attempt for a resolution to the conflict would seem to be quite of an acceptable idea.
_____________________ Cypocalypse2: But, she interacted with you again. Though interacting with her personally doesn't normally manifest in you when you meet her in Peyups.com night outs, she interacts with you if you just make a start--she's practically just a YM away anyway. That's one thing about her that separates her from the other bitches. While the others waits for a guy's affectionate apology, she talks. The Queen talks to you when you attempt to do it. No apology needed, no similar bullshit. All you need to do is make a BUZZ (YM pun intended).
Cypocalypse1: 
Cypocalypse2: See, it's easy to visualize your sentiments. You would think that she had been ri |
|